Comment

Comment by Trudy Sloan on October 8, 2010 at 11:12pm

The first two look kind of like I am seeing spots. I like them very much. So interesting. Way to go Wendy.

Comment by Wendy Rosier on October 5, 2010 at 10:25pm

This the whole shot and the 1st of 5 rapid shots....the focal point was the patch of light in the mid-ground - the upload of the day was from the 5th shot and th question photo was from the 2nd shot

Comment by Avril Kirby on October 5, 2010 at 9:51pm

Well I have no scientific knowledge and can't join in the puzzle solving but I do like the images--they look like some portion of a larger tapestry or something knitted with bumpy wool. Not your usual bokeh.

Comment by Wendy Rosier on October 5, 2010 at 9:36pm

I love honesty Tim - thanks! I had the camera set to multiple shots - there might have been a hair of movement from one shot to the next but so infinitesimal that I wouldn't have thought it would make such a difference

Comment by timothy gibbon on October 5, 2010 at 9:29pm

Is this a conundrum? Camera motion, which I immediately assume this is, is hard to predict. However, if taken milliseconds apart, the reverse wiggle might simply reflect a symmetrical countermotion. (I have no idea what I am talking about).

Comment by Wendy Rosier on October 5, 2010 at 5:05pm

Can anyone with scientific background tell me why the crescents would reverse direction in the same photo taken milliseconds apart like this - and I swear - it has not been flipped